Reference for Bava Kamma 67:8
לא כולה ר"ע היא והכא במאי עסקינן כשפיטמו
of the value of two hundred [<i>zuz</i>] gored an ox of the same value of two hundred [<i>zuz</i>] and injured it to the amount of fifty <i>zuz</i>, but it so happened that the injured ox [subsequently] improved and reached the value of four hundred <i>zuz</i>, since it can be contended that but for the injury it would have reached the value of eight hundred <i>zuz</i>, compensation will be [still] paid as at the time of the damage.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And the defendant cannot put up the increase in the value of the injured ox as a defence, for but for the injury the ox might have reached the value of even eight hundred zuz. ');"><sup>7</sup></span>
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy